In short Online therapy in English in the Netherlands: individual and couples sessions over secure video, scheduled across time zones. Psychodynamic depth work with a US-trained therapist. You pay directly, so nothing runs through local insurance or health records. Fees and fit are covered in a free 15-minute call.

The work

The work I do is relational and focused on pattern. I don't run intake checklists. I don't assign homework. I pay attention to what happens in the session. The moments when something shifts or goes flat. The pattern that keeps showing up underneath the problem. Most people already know their own story. They still keep landing in the same place. What's missing is someone watching in real time, someone who can name what you cannot see from inside it. More on how I work, and how I work with couples.

One thing working in English solves. You can say exactly what you mean. No editing yourself for language. In a second language, people tend to be more careful, more managed. What's lost is often exactly what therapy needs to work with.

The clinical patterns I see most

First: the trailing spouse pattern. One partner was recruited; the other followed. The recruited partner has structure, salary, and an identity that translated. The accompanying partner has had to start their professional life over, often without the right to work immediately, often without their language, often in a city where the social on-ramps are built for the recruited spouse. The friction this produces in the relationship is rarely about the trailing spouse not "trying hard enough." It is about a structural asymmetry that was easy to name in advance and is much harder to live through.

A second pattern: the high-functioning slow-erosion pattern. The person who is, by every external measure, fine. The job is going well, the apartment is fine, the social calendar has people in it, the language lessons are progressing. But the internal experience is a kind of slow gray-out. Nothing is wrong. Nothing is right. The Dutch culture's emphasis on doe maar gewoon, be normal, do not stand out, can intersect with this in a particular way for people who came from cultures where emotional expressiveness is the norm. The flatness gets reinforced from outside.

A third: the couple where one of them has integrated faster. Often the one who speaks Dutch better, or who came with a job, or who is from a culture that aligns more naturally with Dutch directness. The asymmetry stops feeling like circumstance and starts feeling like a verdict on who they each are. The arguments that follow are usually nominally about something else, chores, money, the in-laws, the kids' schooling, but the actual fault line is who has more standing in this country.

Who reaches out from the Netherlands

The people who reach out track those patterns closely. The accompanying partners, often a year or two in, whose professional restart has stalled against the language and the work-permit clock. The high-functioning internationals in the slow gray-out, who have learned to perform normal in a culture that prizes it, and who need a weekly hour where doe maar gewoon does not apply. The couples where one partner integrated faster, arriving because the asymmetry has started to feel like a verdict.

And a steady stream of people who simply refuse the GGZ arithmetic: months of waiting for a short, protocol-shaped course in their second language, for difficulties that were never really clinical categories in the first place. My practice exists for precisely this population; the broader shape of the work is laid out on the page about working with expats. Wherever in the country you are, the sessions look the same: online, weekly, in English, chosen rather than assigned.

What people bring to online therapy

The people I work with in English come for a wide range of reasons: anxiety, depression, stress and burnout, anger, grief and loss, relationship difficulties, loneliness, self-esteem issues, procrastination, sleep problems, attachment patterns, self-sabotage, perfectionism, identity questions, and existential concerns. Online counseling makes this work possible from wherever you are in the Netherlands, whether you need an English-speaking therapist, a virtual counselor, or simply someone who can work in your language at a depth that matters.

How it works

Sessions are online via secure video call. I work with individuals and couples (60 minutes). Before your first session, we have a free 15-minute call to see if this feels like the right fit for you. You can pay in any currency; payment is by card or bank transfer. There is no insurance reimbursement, no Dutch health record, no GP notification, no diagnosis code generated by our work together.

The Dutch public mental health system is thorough on paper and gatekept in practice. Referrals through the huisarts. Long waits. Approved modalities. Sessions in Dutch. Private therapy in English exists in Amsterdam and The Hague. But the pool for sustained, depth-oriented work is small. Rotterdam and anywhere outside the Randstad, you're largely on your own.

I work with anyone who needs support in English and is living in the Netherlands. Relationship trouble. A low you can't quite name. Something you've been carrying for years. Something that just surfaced. Couples who moved here together. The move changed the balance in ways neither of them expected.

You don't need to fit a particular profile. How your life looks and how it actually feels are two different things. The distance between them doesn't have to be dramatic. Even a small gap is worth taking seriously.

How your life looks and how it actually feels are two different things. Both are worth taking seriously.

Being in the Netherlands

The Netherlands has a specific feel for non-Dutch people. The practical side is easy. The country works well. Most people speak English. Everything just works. Socially it is harder than it first appears. The Dutch directness is real. So is the slowness with which social circles open. It is possible to live here for years and still feel like a visitor.

The pattern many of my clients describe is something like this: everything works. The bike paths. The trains. The appointments that start on time. The systems that route around you, efficient and impersonal. But the texture of belonging does not follow. The kind where someone notices you have been quiet. The kind where you can drop by without making a plan three weeks ahead. The practical ease promised it. It does not arrive. This is not a failure on your part. It is the actual sociology of the place.

If that texture is part of what you are dealing with, we can work with it. Functioning well but not quite belonging. The warmth that stays at arm's length. The way you can be fine on paper while quietly disappearing inside. If what brings you has nothing to do with Dutch culture, that is also fine. The work is about what is happening in you, and the country is context.

There is one more layer worth naming, because clients keep discovering it mid-sentence. English fluency here hides the problem it creates. Because every interaction works, in the shop, at the gemeente, at the office, there is no obvious wall to point to, no moment where the country visibly said no. So the not-belonging cannot be blamed on anything, and feelings that cannot be blamed on anything tend to get blamed on the self. I must be doing something wrong. People arrive at that conclusion privately, carry it for a year or two, and say it out loud for the first time in a session. Saying it out loud is usually the beginning of putting it down. The Dutch did not reject you. The structure never had a door where you were looking for one, and that is a different problem, with a different solution.

Why privacy comes up here more than in most countries

Many of the people I work with here hold visible roles. For them, being seen seeking mental healthcare is itself a stress. The ASML engineer. The Booking.com product lead. The Shell or Unilever expat. The EU institution lawyer in The Hague. The ESA staff member in Noordwijk. The academic on a Veni or Vidi grant. All of them carry versions of the same concern. Anything that goes through their huisarts becomes part of their Dutch medical record. Touch insurance and you create a billing code. Some people hold security clearances. Some face visa renewals or employer-paid moves. Some just want work-self and inner-self kept apart. For all of them, private therapy in English keeps the work where it belongs. Between you and your therapist.

This is not about hiding anything. Some kinds of internal work need one certainty. The work itself stays private. What you say in session never joins an administrative trail.

The cities, briefly

The expat clusters here each have their own texture. This matters more than it might sound.

Amsterdam is the most international. It is also the most expensive. The expat density is high enough that you can live almost your whole life in English. That is convenient. For many people it is also exactly the problem. The neighborhoods around the Zuidas (where Booking.com and the financial sector cluster), De Pijp, Oud-Zuid, and increasingly the eastern docklands (Java-eiland, IJburg) are common. The clinical pattern I see most often: people who arrived energized, expected the city to do more of the work of belonging than it does, and quietly hit a wall somewhere between months nine and eighteen.

Den Haag (The Hague) has the diplomatic and institutional expat cluster, EU agencies, NATO, embassies, international courts, oil and gas, and runs older and more family-oriented than Amsterdam. The pattern here often involves trailing spouses on accompanying visas, identity around career interruption, and the particular boredom of a city that closes earlier and feels more provincial than expected.

Rotterdam is more working, more direct, more architecturally interesting, and increasingly hipper. The expats here tend to be in engineering, port logistics, design, or have actively chosen Rotterdam over Amsterdam for cost or character reasons. The texture is different, less English-by-default, more Dutch-by-default, which produces a different clinical picture.

Utrecht and Eindhoven have their own expat clusters: Utrecht around the university, the railway hub, and increasingly the tech sector; Eindhoven dominated by ASML and the high-tech campus, with a heavy concentration of single-male engineers from across Europe and Asia, and the relational isolation that goes with that demographic.

Wherever you are in the Netherlands, the work is the same. The neighborhood and the workweek shape the texture of life here, and what you bring to therapy reflects that.

Couples therapy for expats in the Netherlands

The couples work I do follows similar lines whether you are in Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam, or anywhere else in the country. The session is online, both partners on the same screen or in separate locations if travel separates you. The work is depth-oriented: not communication-skills training, not assigned exercises between sessions, but careful attention to the pattern that keeps producing the same argument under different surfaces.

For expat couples specifically, that pattern often involves an unresolved question about whose life this is, whose career drove the move, whose family of origin gets the weekly call, whose language wins when you are tired. These are not abstract problems. They are the friction in your week, the silence on the bike ride home, the way one of you keeps suggesting Christmas back home and the other keeps saying maybe next year. Working with them means naming the asymmetry without either partner becoming the problem. Read more about couples therapy in the Netherlands.

Most Dutch-based inquiries come from the capital; the Amsterdam page covers the GGZ waits and the city itself in more detail.

For the international-law and diplomatic world, the The Hague page covers secondary trauma, clearance-grade confidentiality, and the referral wait.

Rotterdam has its own page as well: English therapy in Rotterdam, covering the port city’s international workforce and how sessions work from there.

Dedicated city pages: Rotterdam, Utrecht, and Eindhoven.

Dutch mental healthcare, briefly: why people end up seeking private English therapy

The Dutch system is built on a particular structure that surprises people who expect a healthcare experience like the one they had at home. The general practitioner, the huisarts, is the gatekeeper. To access reimbursed mental healthcare, you typically need a referral from your huisarts, who decides whether your situation belongs in generalistische basis GGZ (basic mental healthcare, time-limited) or specialistische GGZ (specialist care, for more complex situations). The huisarts is also free to suggest the praktijkondersteuner GGZ, a mental health nurse working out of the GP's office, available for short-term work.

The two reasons people end up looking outside this system are predictable. The first is wait times. Once referred to specialistische GGZ, the waiting period for an intake is commonly eight to fourteen weeks, sometimes longer in Amsterdam and Utrecht. The treatment that follows is typically CBT or short-term protocol-based work, in Dutch unless the practice happens to have an English-speaking clinician available. The second reason is the kind of work itself. The reimbursed system is structured around symptom-coded treatment for specific diagnoses, which is a perfectly reasonable model for some situations and a poor fit for the kind of long-recurring patterns most of my clients are dealing with.

Private English-language therapy sidesteps both. There is no waiting list, no referral, no diagnosis required, no Dutch fluency required, and no insurance reimbursement either. You pay directly. For people whose work or temperament makes them want to keep their mental healthcare entirely outside the Dutch health record, the absence of insurance involvement is the point.

The regulatory picture, in plain language

For English-speaking clients trying to work out who actually does what in the Netherlands, the terminology is genuinely confusing. The protected titles are psycholoog (psychologist, regulated by the BIG register if BIG-registered) and psychotherapeut (psychotherapist, BIG-registered, master's plus post-graduate clinical training). Anyone can call themselves a counselor or coach; those are not legally protected in the same way. The NIP (Nederlands Instituut van Psychologen) is the main professional association for psychologists, and the NVP (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychotherapie) is its counterpart for psychotherapists.

I am a US-trained therapist working online, so none of the Dutch registers apply to me. I hold a master's in counseling from La Salle University, a master's in sociology from UC Berkeley, completed an 18-month internship in psychodynamic therapy at the Philadelphia Consultation Center. My work is talk therapy delivered online in English; clients who want to use Dutch insurance reimbursement need to see a BIG-registered psychologist or psychotherapist, not me. I make this distinction clearly because it matters: my work fits a particular kind of client whose priorities are depth, continuity, language, and privacy, not insurance reimbursement.

What the Dutch waiting lists look like right now

The system has an official standard for waiting, the Treeknorm: four weeks from referral to intake, fourteen weeks in total to the start of treatment. Those are targets. The current numbers do not meet them. In early 2026, the mental health federation MIND analyzed the NZa's own waiting-list dashboard and counted more than 100,000 people waiting for GGZ care. Over half had waited longer than the fourteen-week maximum, and that group had grown 35 percent in a year. For specialist care, the wait for an intake alone now averages around fourteen weeks against the four-week standard.

For internationals, the practical reading is simple. The norm is a target the system publishes, and the dashboard shows how often it is missed. If your Dutch is limited, the effective wait is longer still, because the English-capable slice of the reimbursed system is small. And if what you need is couples work, the queue question falls away entirely: relatietherapie sits outside the basisverzekering, so couples pay privately in any case. I cover that on the couples therapy in the Netherlands page. My own practice stands outside the referral system on purpose: online, in English, no waiting list, paid directly.

Common questions about therapy in the Netherlands

How long are the GGZ waiting lists?
After a huisarts referral and intake triage, the wait to begin specialistische GGZ care commonly runs from a couple of months to well over half a year, and longer in parts of the Randstad. Basis GGZ is usually faster. Private therapy needs no referral and no waiting list: I can normally start within a week or two, in English, at a session fee rather than a covered place.
Do I need a referral from my huisarts to work with you?
No. The referral chain exists for reimbursed GGZ care. Working with me is a direct private arrangement, so there is no huisarts letter, no diagnosis code, no eigen risico, and nothing enters your Dutch medical record. If what you need is medication or a formal assessment, the huisarts route is the right one, and a free 15-minute call will tell you which of us you actually need.
Can I have therapy in English without using Dutch insurance, and what does it cost?
Yes, and for most of my clients that is the point. Private therapy sits entirely outside the basisverzekering: you pay per session and never touch the eigen risico, the compulsory annual deductible that is 385 euros in 2026 and applies to specialist GGZ care once you are inside the insured system. You can pay in any currency, by card or bank transfer. The trade is explicit. No reimbursement, in exchange for starting now, in your own language, with open-ended depth work rather than a fixed protocol.
Does online therapy work as well as meeting in person?
For talk therapy, the research finds no meaningful difference in outcome between video and in-person work. What changes is access, not depth: you can work with someone who fits, in English, from wherever you are, without a commute or a waiting list. For the pattern-focused work I do, what matters is the quality of attention between two people, and that survives the screen better than most people expect before they try it.
I live outside the Randstad. Can you still work with me?
Yes. Because sessions are online, where you live in the Netherlands makes no difference: Rotterdam, Utrecht, Eindhoven, Groningen, Maastricht, or a village with one bus a day are all the same to the work. The English-speaking private options thin out fast once you leave Amsterdam and The Hague, which is exactly where online practice closes the gap.
Can you prescribe medication or give a formal diagnosis?
No. I am a therapist, not a physician, and my work is talk therapy. Medication in the Netherlands runs through your huisarts or a psychiater, and a formal diagnostic assessment for insurance or disability purposes needs a BIG-registered clinician inside the Dutch system. I am happy to work alongside a prescriber if you have one. If medication is the main thing you are looking for, I will say so on our first call and point you to the right route.
How do I find an English-speaking therapist in the Netherlands?
Three routes. The GGZ through your huisarts, which is thorough but slow and rations care by diagnosis. The private English-speaking scene in the Randstad, which is real but busy. Or online, which opens the field beyond the Netherlands entirely. If the waiting list is the problem, private and online are the ways around it. Check training either way, have a first call, and weigh the conversation more heavily than the profile.

Selected research on this approach

My work is psychodynamic and depth-oriented. These are some of the studies on the effectiveness of that kind of therapy. They describe research on the method in general, and are not claims about any individual outcome.

  • Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. doi:10.1037/a0018378
  • Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: as efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(10), 943-953. PMID 28541091

The full reading list is on the approach page.