Finland has a real but layered therapy market, and for English-speakers the public route is largely closed off. The private English-speaking pool concentrates in Helsinki and a few other cities, and online work removes the rest of the distance.
I work with anyone who needs support in English and is living in Finland. Relationship strain, a flatness you can't quite place, burnout, or something specific you want to change.
The work
The work I do is relational and pattern-focused. I don't run intake checklists or assign homework between sessions; I pay attention to what happens in the session, the moments when something shifts or goes flat, and the recurring pattern underneath the presenting problem. Most people already know the story of their situation and keep landing in the same place. What's missing is someone watching in real time who can name what's invisible from inside it. More on how I work, and how I work with couples.
Being in Finland
Finland is calm, functional, and not always easy to feel inside of. The winters are long and dark, the social culture is reserved, and a foreigner can spend years here while still feeling slightly outside the language. The people who come to me are the tech and design professionals, the university researchers, the relocated partners, and the long-term expats who have built a life here and want to do some real work on it in their own language.
The Finnish system: structured, and hard for foreigners to use
Public mental health runs through health centres and occupational healthcare, and there is a substantial public benefit, Kela rehabilitation psychotherapy, that reimburses about 57 euros a session. The catch for most expats is the route to it: it requires a diagnosed condition, a psychiatrist's B-statement, and a three-month treatment period before Kela will approve anything, and the way psychotherapy is regulated in Finland excludes nearly all foreign-trained therapists. Public internet therapy is free but available only in Finnish and Swedish. For an English-speaker new to the country, the first months of therapy are often fully private.
Where I stand relative to Kela and Valvira
I am US-trained and not on the Finnish registers. In Finland the titles psychologist (psykologi) and psychotherapist (psykoterapeutti) are protected and registered with Valvira, which I do not hold, and I am not a Kela-approved provider, so sessions with me are private and are not reimbursed. What I offer is sustained depth work in English, paid directly, with no referral and no waitlist beyond my availability. If you need a Kela-subsidised programme, medication, or Finnish-language public care, I will say so and point you toward it.
Helsinki, mostly
English-speaking private therapists concentrate in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa, with smaller pools in Tampere and Turku, and the experienced ones book out. Private sessions in Finland generally run 90 to 150 euros, higher in the capital. Outside the cities, English-language options thin quickly, which is where online work removes the problem. A Helsinki evening sits in my US morning.
Questions people ask from Finland
What people bring to online therapy
The people I work with in English come for a wide range of reasons: anxiety, depression, stress and burnout, anger management, grief and loss, relationship difficulties, loneliness, self-esteem issues, procrastination, sleep problems, attachment patterns, self-sabotage, perfectionism, identity questions, and existential concerns. Online counseling makes this work possible from wherever you are, whether you need an English-speaking therapist, a virtual counselor, or simply someone who can work in your language at a depth that matters.
How it works
Sessions are online via secure video call. I work with individuals and couples (60 minutes). Before your first session, we have a free 15-minute call to see if this feels like the right fit for you.
Selected research on this approach
My work is psychodynamic and depth-oriented. These are some of the studies on the effectiveness of that kind of therapy. They describe research on the method in general, and are not claims about any individual outcome.
- Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. doi:10.1037/a0018378
- Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: as efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(10), 943-953. PMID 28541091
- Leichsenring, F., Abbass, A., Heim, N., Keefe, J. R., Kisely, S., Luyten, P., Rabung, S., & Steinert, C. (2023). The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders: an umbrella review based on updated criteria. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 286-304. PMC10168167