Something stopped working. The usual moves aren't fixing it.

Most men who end up in therapy did not start because they were falling apart. They started because something stopped working and they could not figure out why. The job was fine. The relationship was technically okay. Nothing was broken. But something was off in a way that was hard to name, and the things that usually worked, staying busy, pushing through, giving it time, were not touching it.

Some were getting angrier than the situation called for. Some had gone flat in a way that had been building for years. Some looked at their life and could not connect with it, even though it was the life they had worked toward. Some were watching themselves repeat patterns they could see clearly and could not seem to stop. A few had a partner who told them directly that something needed to change.

What brought them in was not crisis. It was the particular frustration of being intelligent, capable, self-aware, and still stuck.

What men actually say about this

The descriptions vary, but certain things keep coming up. I knew I needed to do something, but I kept thinking I could figure it out myself. I'd been told my whole life that you handle your own problems. I wasn't in crisis. My life was fine. I couldn't justify it.

One man put it this way: his wife had told him the marriage wasn't going to last if things stayed the same. He described himself as someone who would fly off the handle fast if he felt disrespected. It took him years of therapy to understand the notion of pausing before acting. Another said he'd spent most of his life trying not to think too much about his childhood, getting by, until a couple of things happened in the same month and everything that had been manageable suddenly wasn't.

A third described it as: I thought I was strong enough to deal with my own problems. The problem was that my problems were spilling onto other people's laps.

What each of these men had in common was not weakness. It was a particular kind of organization, a way of managing that worked for a long time and then started producing costs they couldn't keep absorbing.

How men are organized around not needing things

Most men learn early, from their families or their culture or both, that needing things is a problem. Not a sign of humanity. A liability. The version of strength that gets rewarded is the version that does not require anything from anyone. So you build a self that is good at not needing. Good at managing. Good at solving. Good at functioning under conditions that would stop other people.

That version of yourself is real. It is capable. It earned you real things. But it also has a cost that accumulates over time, because suppressing the part of you that wants, and needs, and is angry at having to carry everything alone, does not make those things go away. It puts them somewhere where they show up sideways. In the irritability that seems disproportionate to what triggered it. In the flatness that has been there for years without a name. In the distance from people you are technically close to. In the sense that you are performing a version of your life rather than living it.

You are not broken. You are running a system that was designed for a different environment than the one you are in now.

The anger question

Anger comes up often in this work, and usually not in the way men expect. Most of the men I work with do not think of themselves as angry people. They are patient. They handle things. And then something small happens and the response is out of proportion, and they feel terrible about it afterward, and they cannot explain where it came from.

What comes before anger, almost always, is something else: a feeling of being unseen, or disrespected, or carrying something that is not being acknowledged. The anger is a response to vulnerability that is not allowed to be vulnerability. It is what happens when the feelings that do not fit the self-image get compressed and then find another exit.

I wrote more about this on the anger page. The short version: anger management is mostly not the right frame. The question is not how to control the anger. It is what the anger is covering.

The pattern that will not break

Many of the men I work with have done therapy before. They can explain their patterns in precise psychological language. They know where the patterns came from. And they are still running them.

This is one of the more disorienting experiences a person can have: understanding something thoroughly and finding that the understanding has not changed it. The pattern keeps repeating in relationships, at work, in the way you respond to stress, in the gap between what you want to do and what you actually do.

Understanding why you do something is not the same as being able to stop. The pattern runs below the level of insight. It lives in the body and in the reflexes, in the automatic responses that fire before you have had time to think. More on this on the insight without change page.

What the work actually looks like

Sessions are a conversation. There are no worksheets, no exercises to do between appointments, no frameworks to apply. What there is is a quality of attention that is different from what you are used to, from anyone, including previous therapists.

I pay attention to what you say, but I also pay attention to how you say it. What you come back to without meaning to. Where the energy shifts. When you are performing composure for me the way you perform it for everyone else. When you minimize something that deserved more space than you gave it. When you explain your own behavior in a way that lets you off the hook from having to actually feel it.

When I notice something, I say it. Not to provoke you, but because the pattern is live in the room, and that is where there is something to work with. This is therapy from the character-analytic tradition, Reich, Kaiser, Shapiro. It works with who you are, not just what you feel. My full approach is described on that page.

I have Tourette syndrome myself, which is part of what I bring to this work. Not as a credential, but as something that has given me a particular kind of familiarity with the experience of having a body and a nervous system that do things you did not choose, and with what it is like to move through the world while managing something that other people do not see.

On coming to therapy as a man

There is a version of this conversation that is entirely about stigma, about how men are socialized not to ask for help, about toxic masculinity, about the numbers. I am not going to have that conversation with you, because you already know all of it, and because the men who find their way here are not usually stuck on stigma.

What they are stuck on is something more specific. They do not quite believe that talking to someone will actually change anything. They have tried talking before and it did not do much. They are skeptical that a therapist will be able to see something they cannot see themselves, given how carefully they have already looked. They are not sure they want to open something up that they have kept managed for years.

Those are legitimate concerns, not defenses to be overcome. The question of whether this particular kind of work with this particular person will do anything is a reasonable one, and the only honest answer is that you will not know until you have had a conversation. That is what the 15-minute call is for.

Frequently asked questions

Related