Therapy in English

Grief That Doesn't Follow the Rules

What follows is how I understand and approach this issue in my work with clients.

Grief therapy and bereavement counseling for loss that doesn’t follow the textbook. If you’re looking for a grief counselor or therapist for complicated grief, the stages model was never about grief. The real work is messier and more honest.

You're supposed to be over it by now. That's the message, anyway - from the culture, from well-meaning friends, from the timetable you've internalized that says grief should follow a recognizable arc: shock, then sadness, then gradual acceptance, then moving on. Maybe it's been months. Maybe years. And you're not over it. Or you were over it, and then it came back, ambushing you in the cereal aisle or during a Tuesday conference call or at 3 a.m. when the world is quiet enough to hear what you've been outrunning. Or you never felt it at all - the loss happened and you handled it, managed it, kept functioning, and now some part of you wonders whether there's something wrong with a person who can lose someone they loved and feel... nothing.

Grief doesn't follow rules. That's not a poetic statement - it's a clinical one. The stage models that most people carry in their heads (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance) were never meant to describe a linear process that every grieving person moves through in order. They've been so thoroughly absorbed by popular culture that they function as a prescription rather than a description, and the gap between how grief "should" look and how it actually looks produces a secondary suffering: the grief about grieving wrong.

What grief actually looks like

Contemporary grief research has moved far beyond stage models. The dual process model, developed by Stroebe and Schut, describes grief as an oscillation between two orientations: loss-oriented processing (confronting the grief, sitting with the pain, feeling the absence) and restoration-oriented processing (attending to the practical demands of life, rebuilding, moving forward). Healthy grief involves moving back and forth between these two modes - not progressing through one to reach the other, but oscillating, sometimes within a single day.

This oscillation explains what confuses most grieving people and everyone around them: the unpredictability. You can be genuinely okay on Tuesday and destroyed on Wednesday. You can laugh at dinner and cry in the parking lot. You can go weeks feeling like you've turned a corner and then get flattened by a song on the radio. This isn't regression or failure. This is grief working the way grief works - in waves, not in stages.

It also explains why some people seem to "skip" the grief entirely - they move immediately into restoration mode, handling logistics, managing other people's emotions, keeping everything running. The grief isn't absent. It's being deferred. The loss-oriented processing will arrive eventually, sometimes months or years later, triggered by something seemingly unrelated. The person who didn't cry at the funeral may break down when they find the deceased person's handwriting on a grocery list eighteen months later. The grief waited for a moment when the person could afford to feel it.

Want to talk about this?

I work with people all over the world, in English, online.

Schedule a Free Consultation

A brief conversation to see if this feels like the right fit for you. Not therapy.

The grief nobody recognizes

Some of the most painful grief never gets validated because it doesn't fit the cultural template for legitimate loss. Disenfranchised grief - a term from Kenneth Doka's research - describes grief that isn't socially sanctioned. The loss of a relationship that other people didn't consider significant. The grief after a miscarriage that you're told was "early." The death of an ex-partner. The loss of a pet that was, in fact, your most important relationship. The grief of an estrangement - losing a parent who is still alive, losing a friend who chose to leave. The grief of a life you didn't get to live: the career that didn't happen, the child you didn't have, the version of your life that existed in your imagination and will never exist in reality.

These losses are real. The grief they produce is real. But the absence of social recognition - the sense that you're not "supposed" to be this affected - isolates the grieving person and adds a layer of shame to an already painful experience. You grieve in private because public grief requires a publicly recognized loss. And you wonder why you can't just get over something that, in everyone else's estimation, shouldn't be that big a deal.

When grief gets stuck

Grief gets stuck - not at a "stage" but in the suppression system. The person who can't cry, whose system intercepted the grief before it could land, may carry the weight of an unfelt loss for years without connecting their current flatness or exhaustion to the grief they never processed. The person who moved immediately into caretaker mode - managing the funeral, supporting everyone else, handling the logistics - may have used their familiar role to avoid the helplessness that grief demands.

Because grief IS helplessness. Grief is, at bottom, the emotional experience of a loss you cannot fix, undo, or control. You can't bring the person back. You can't restore the relationship. You can't recover the life that's gone. You can only feel the absence, which means occupying a position of complete powerlessness. And if your characterological system was built to avoid helplessness - if the whole structure of your personality is organized around being capable, in control, the one who manages - then grief represents a direct threat to the system. The overthinking starts, or the body absorbs what the mind won't feel, or the person doubles down on functioning and wonders, months later, why they're so exhausted.

What actually helps

Not "getting through it." Not "moving on." Not the five stages in the right order with acceptance waiting at the end like a graduation ceremony. What helps is letting the grief arrive in whatever form it takes, at whatever pace it arrives, without treating its unpredictability as evidence that you're doing it wrong.

The waves don't need to be managed. They need to be felt. The oscillation between grief and functioning isn't a failure of progress - it's the mechanism of processing. You can be flattened by loss on Tuesday and productive on Wednesday and that doesn't mean Wednesday is a lie or Tuesday was a setback. It means you're grieving, and grieving looks like this.

In therapy, the work is often about giving the grief room it was never given - either because the person's system suppressed it, or because the social environment didn't validate it, or because the demands of life required the person to keep functioning before the loss had been felt. The therapist holds the space. The person, sometimes for the first time, lets the loss be as big as it actually is. Not as big as it's supposed to be. Not as small as they've been telling themselves. As big as it is.

Grief doesn't follow rules. It follows need. And the need, no matter how long it's been deferred, doesn't expire. The loss you haven't cried for is still waiting. Not because you're doing it wrong, but because the feeling is patient, and it will wait for you to be ready. And when you're ready - when the system loosens, when the room is safe enough, when someone is present enough to hold it with you - the grief will arrive. And it will hurt. And it will also, finally, be real.

References & Further Reading

Stroebe, M. & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224.
Doka, K. J. (2002). Disenfranchised Grief: New Directions, Challenges, and Strategies for Practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Worden, J. W. (2009). Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner (4th ed.). Springer.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss, Sadness, and Depression. New York: Basic Books.

Aaron Platt

Aaron Platt, MA (Counseling, La Salle; Sociology, UC Berkeley) is a therapist offering individual and couples therapy in English to clients worldwide. His psychodynamic approach focuses on the patterns that keep people stuck, not the surface symptoms, but the underlying structure.

About Aaron · Schedule a first session

What Clients Say

“I came in thinking I knew what my issues were. I’d been over them a hundred times. But those were just the things I could already see. Aaron helped me notice what I couldn’t, and that’s where everything actually started to change.”

“I’d been in and out of therapy for years. Different therapists, different approaches, none of it really stuck. Aaron helped me understand more in a few months than all of them combined. And he talked to me like a normal person, not like all this weird therapy-speak.”

“A few years ago I suddenly developed prolonged panic attacks but couldn’t begin to understand what had caused them. Having been in therapy in the past, and being a counseling intern student, I felt I had exhausted my resources trying to figure out “What is wrong with me?” I can honestly say Aaron provides a form of counseling that is difficult to find anywhere else regarding efficacy. Not only has his approach been effective, but he also has provided me a safe space to explore aspects about myself I may not otherwise have felt able to. I cannot recommend him enough as he has helped me feel more myself than ever before.”

Schedule a Free Consultation
A brief conversation to see if this feels like the right fit for you. Not therapy, not a sales pitch.
Session fees:Individual & Couples (60 min): $200 / €170.
Longer sessions available at pro-rated rates.
All currencies accepted.
or email aaron@therapy-in-english.com · WhatsApp

I write about this stuff.

Not tips. Not advice. Just honest writing about what keeps people stuck and what actually shifts things. If you want the next one, leave your email.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Just essays.

Message me on WhatsApp
Sound familiar? Talk to Aaron